Design Strategies

Reducing Heat Loss & Air Resistance In HVAC Systems
Posted by

Reducing Heat Loss & Air Resistance In HVAC Systems

Reducing heat loss and friction in an HVAC system’s air distribution system can help provide energy efficiency gains.

Heat Loss

Air is usually heated or cooled far beyond the desired comfort temperature, but then mixed with room air in a proportion that will arrive at the target temperature.  Because of this, it is often important for supply ducts to be insulated and well-sealed.

Leaky ductwork can cause 20 – 40% of heating and cooling energy.1 This is less of an issue for exhaust ducts, and is not an issue for the parts of the supply duct located within the conditioned space.

Conditioned air that is exhausted to the outside represents a loss of energy, as new air must be heated or cooled to replace it.  However, heat recovery ventilators can allow HVAC systems to recycle the heating or cooling energy of exhaust air while still bringing in fresh air.

Sometimes outside air takes less energy to condition than recycled air. For instance, in warm climates where recycled air has had the heat from people and equipment added to it.

Economizers are units that switch between using outside air and recycled inside air, based on which requires less energy to cool.  Such systems can significantly reduce HVAC energy use in mild climates, and can also improve indoor air quality by providing more fresh air.

Air Resistance In Ducts

Fans usually push air through several different ducts or other pathways, all of which cause fluid drag. The efficiency of any given air path is generally measured by its resistance to air flow. This is its static pressure loss or “head loss.”

Head loss occurs in two ways: 

  1. By fluid drag against the walls of the pipe itself, which is called major head loss.
  2. Losses caused by going around corners, or through valves and joints, which is called minor head loss.

Reducing Major Head Loss

A simplified version of the equation for major loss is:


H is head loss (measured by pressure loss, but used to measure energy loss)

f is friction from the duct’s surface roughness

L is length of travel for the air

v is the velocity at which the air travels

D is the size (“hydraulic diameter“) of the duct, plenum, or other enclosure the air travels through.

Based on understanding this equation, there are four ways to reduce major head loss:

  1. Make ducts smoother to reduce surface friction
  2. Reduce the length
  3. Reduce the velocity – This is very effective, since energy loss rises with the square of velocity
  4. Increase duct size (“hydraulic radius”) – This is by far the most effective, since energy loss rises with the fifth power of hydraulic radius.  That means doubling the diameter cuts losses by 32 times.  It also combines with slower air velocity, since a larger cross-sectional area can deliver the same volume of air at a lower speed than a smaller duct can.

Short, fat, smooth ducts with slower airflow can reduce major head loss. 

See an example in this video on the fundamentals of fluid flow.

Reducing Minor Head Loss

Minor head loss, despite its name, can really add up.

If there are too many sharp bends in your duct system, you might double the energy loss accidentally.  If a valve is closed, the energy loss becomes infinite because no air can flow through, and whatever fans are trying to push air through are simply turning their energy into waste heat.

Minor losses can be measured as a unitless coefficient between zero (for no losses) and one (for 100% energy loss).  They are also often calculated as the equivalent length of straight pipe in the same system.  A duct section with a tight bend can easily have its equivalent length be three to five times its actual length.

A short duct with a sudden bend can be equivalent to a far longer length of straight duct

Reducing minor head loss is simple: Create layouts with fewer bends, larger radii of bends, and fewer valves, fittings, or other interruptions to air flow.

While there is not a single simple equation for this, there are many lookup tables by manufacturers and educational groups, which list minor loss coefficients or equivalent lengths for most common configurations.

Air filters are a common source of pressure loss.  The effectiveness of filters at removing contaminants must be balanced against the resistance they cause to airflow.  Filters that have very large surface areas (by being deeply corrugated) cause less resistance than flat filters.

Deeply corrugated filters pose less resistance to airflow


0 0 652 03 April, 2015 April 3, 2015
0 votes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Comments